http://giaydantuongnnt.com/cho-thue-tho-thi-cong-giay-dan-tuong-tai-ha-noi-gia-re-15k-1m

Ctrl F will bring up the search box.

There is a 68k facebook page, where I put a picture if you look at the post office who has to reach twenty thousand, but if I make a link to a page you have 50 people saw this post. Why is this? thank you

thank you great article, visit our

website

giấy dán tường phòng ngủ

|

giấy dán tường hàn quốc

|

giấy dán tường giá rẻ

|

giấy dán tường trung quốc

|

giấy dán tường phòng khách

Thanks for the help Sofia! However, my problem is I can’t search for anything? When i go to “Find” at the top of Open Office and click enter it says “Search key not found” How do I search? lol

Hi Tasha, I don’t know if you found the answer to this but here it goes anyway… I did the same exercise and I couldn’t find hide_all so what I did was find hide_. Facebook might have changed their field name on the export data and it’s now “hide_clicks”. Hope this helps.

I like your logic, true all TV shows or TV ads don’t reach all potential viewers. Good point that also gets lost. But to me, the difference is that with radio, TV & newspapers, they show pretty much the same content & ads for all people who are watching/listening/reading at that time/day’s media/content. They don’t chose which articles or which ads I see. Those of us watching/hearing/reading pretty much all “see” the same thing.

I don’t trust Facebook’s algorithm enough to choose FOR me what I may or may not want to see. While I am on Facebook at a certain time, as a user, my preference (and many people’s assumption) would be that I am seeing all of the current content from all of my friends and from all of the pages I’ve connected with, except those I have chosen to unfriend or hide. But Facebook doesn’t do that.

I also tested by categorizing into interest lists but never actually clicking those interest lists. No pages in my feed. Ever. Then I’d click on one list..let’s say “Green Pages” and they’d be in my feed for a few days while pages in the other lists never showed.

So, in the end, I click my “Everything” list (I put each and every page I like in this list as well as it’s own category) nearly daily even if I don’t interact or even look at them all. It keeps everything in my feed all the time.

Just realized on one of our highest hide all days one of our posts double posted (same post appeared two times back to back). I guess if I saw that, I may hide all as well.

Hi, Kari! Facebook actually killed the All feed. They didn’t even know it was out there.

Good point about Interest Lists. Wow, you really use them! That would definitely impact some of the stats. That said, I’m confident in assuming you are the exception to the rule! I don’t think most people use Interest Lists, and I’d say a small fraction of 1% use it in this way. You’re a power user!

Recently I ran across a URL for an “All” feed on Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/?sk=nf_all. When I first started using the feed, it did show me a lot more posts from people and pages I had not seen activity from in a long time. For about the past week or so, I have been having a lot of issues with photos in my news feed and I noticed that when those issues started up, my “All” feed was also affected… it’s now the same feed as my “Most Recent” and “Top Stories” feeds. (Yes, I opened all 3 simultaneously and all 3 were identical to one another. Don’t judge me. lol) I really enjoyed the “All” feed when it was working properly, and hope Facebook gets through tinkering soon so the “All” feed is fixed. Give it a try if you haven’t yet. Perhaps it will work for you.

On a separate note, I am wondering if my methods of organizing within Facebook could negatively impact the stats you are referring to. I live and work in Montana, a large, vastly rural state. There are many miles between cities here. However my job requires me to be connected in many cities and regions. In my personal news feed, I don’t want to see the lunch specials for a diner in a town hundreds of miles away, but I do want to keep those contacts in Interest Lists so I can keep up to date with the community for pages I manage there. I put pages into geographically sorted Interest Lists, and if they are not a page I want to keep up with personally, I uncheck “Show in News Feed.” That happens to most pages I have liked. This routine allows me specific feeds to see what’s happening in other regions and keeps my personal feed in a relatively clutter-free state, so it is optimal for me and my specific needs.

You’ve convinced me to give the ticker another shot. ;-)

Thanks! Personally, I love the Ticker. I think people misunderstand what it’s for. It’s incredibly valuable to keep up with what’s happening when you’re not on your News Feed. It’s also terrific for surfacing recent activity on old content. For example, if someone comments today on a photo from last week, News Feed would never show that. It would only show the first share. Ticker allows me to jump back into the conversation.

I don’t completely disagree, though, that an unfiltered OPTION would be something to consider. I don’t think it would be in Facebook’s best interests to make such an option the default view, which is what many are suggesting.

Thanks for reading!

Good points, Steve! I do think, though, that you can’t ignore the pages that people like simply to voice that they like the product, with no expectation that they’ll ever hear from that brand. I know I like a bunch of those pages.

Additionally, while a News Feed that the user can fine tune themselves sounds great, Facebook users have proven time and time again that they’re lazy and won’t use features that will make their feed better. Sure, you and I would (and do), but most will and do not. The impact of that without News Feed is boredom of all of the crap that flows through. And there will be a lot of crap.

As a user, I do not want to see 250 marketing messages every day in my News Feed from the 250 pages that I like. That would ruin my Facebook experience.

I get that people can hide my posts from their feed – and you’re right we just have to deal with that. Although why a person would hide my posts when the “unlike” button is actually easier to get to (you have to use the unlike button to get to the hide setting…)

But as I understand it – many of our followers are now not even getting the posts on their timeline – and this is not a gradual thing – I have one client who was getting between 10 and 13k “people saw this post” – the page has just over 500 followers – this is s very niche site and all the likes are genuine – or most… we only get a few added each week so I generally take a look at them and they “fit the profile” etc….

A couple of weeks ago these “people saw this post” dropped to between 100 and 200!

That is a massive drop and is worrying. And it seems that we are going to have to work on improving Edge Rank (we should obviously do that) but it’s harder for some pages than others – this particular client is one of the harder ones. Not me complaining and looking to blame fb – but many of the techniques we might look to use – such a s special promotions are simply not appropriate here.

This is not the client’s sector, but a generic illustration of what I mean… say we ran a page for people contemplating suicide. It could get a good number of followers, but they would be unlikely to “share” the content . in fact, they might well not even want to comment. As a result they would stop seeing the content – fb would simply assume that since they hadn’t liked and shared that they were not interested.

It would make more sense for fb to simply allow users to decide if they want to unlike a page.

That’s what like means – I like a page – because I want to keep up with their posts – if they post too much, or if I no longer find their posts interesting (lots of those) then I can simply unlike them.

It really should not be up to fb to decide what I can see from the pages I CHOSE to follow. Who are they to censor my relationship with the page? There really is little justification. I cannot understand why people would follow thousands and thousands of pages – it doesn’t make sense – but I also don’t see why fb should interfere.

It is a little like signing up for cable TV – and then the cable company deciding that you can no longer have access to certain channels because you haven’t watched anything on that channel for a month or more…

Just my 2 cents….

I’d have to check my pages’ Insights spreadsheet too. Thanks for this excellent “expose” Jon

Hmmmm… 1/3 definitely seems high! I’d take a look at frequency and content.

I KNOW! I tend to use the 20% open rate bench mark for email as an example. Email’s a stationary target. Facebook users will only see your stuff when timed perfectly (and they’re on Facebook for an average of only 30 minutes per day). The expectation that they’ll see your content is insane. Great comparison with TV and radio as well!

Thanks for the comment and kind words, Mikel!

Sounds like you could push the envelope a bit more, Darrin!

Honestly, there’s not much you can actually make of the number unless it’s insanely high. Even then, I’d bet that political pages and famous people with high engagement have very high Hide All numbers as well.

Thank you so much for the kind words, Dawn! And I agree 100%. It’s one reason why I write so much content. By no means do I expect that my readers will see everything I write. In fact, I know that they don’t WANT to see everything I write. It’s an insanely unreasonable expectation.

Some are bent out of shape about not reaching “all of their fans.” It seems pretty normal to me.

Thanks so much for the comment!

Thanks, Gordon! Since Facebook provides no details about who these people are — and it’s impossible to figure it out — there’s nothing you can do. Just gotta deal with it!

The whole deleting fans thing is kinda tricky, I might add. There may be some who are pretty obviously bots, for example… But you’re bound to mistakenly delete some who are actually interested in your content. I just tend to leave it.

That’s an excellent point, Jacob. Definitely something I’ll take a closer look at. Of course, there will always be a level of unknown since Facebook doesn’t break this down.

Pretty amazing, isn’t it? As robust and incredibly overwhelming as their stats are, there seem to be so many sets of data missing that could make it better!

Thanks for your thoughts!

Unless you’ve liked the page, you can’t hide their content other than the story generated by your friend’s action. But I would like to know if hiding an individual story from my friend is reflected in the negative feedback on my page. That would certainly skew the stats.

If I consistently like your posts, there’s a chance they would start appearing in the newsfeed of people that I went to high school with and who might have liked images of my children – but they don’t care at all about Facebook statistics.

After a while they should get annoyed and hide your posts from their feed but keep seeing pictures of my children.

If I look at my statistics, the number of hides and spam reports correlate with the sponsored posts, I have made. The further reach – the more negative feedback.

The way I read the data export, the people who have hidden my posts, are not likely to be fans – more likely to be friends of fans or even more remotely connected than that.

If I reach 54.000 people with a sponsored post and have a negative feedback of 28 users, I assume that’s quite OK – especially since some of the people who reported spam may also have clicked “Hide all”.